Skip Nav

LNAT Essay: Top 6 Tips

LAW NATIONAL ADMISSIONS TEST: ESSAY QUESTIONS

❶Essay homework helpful or. Prepare for law lnat, can help argumentative essay.

More LNAT Help

Recent Posts
Chat forums
Post navigation

Your answer should be no longer than words, and a standard essay should be between to words. You will only have 40 minutes to conduct the entire essay, and so time management is crucial. You will need to construct a clear and concise argument that is straight to the point, provides a quality argument, and most importantly is written in a persuasive, controlled and detailed manner. The best preparation for your LNAT in regards to the essay section of the assessment, is to practice drafting essay plans and reading high quality newspapers usually in the form of a broadsheet.

Reading newspapers will allow you to gain a basic understanding of the goings-on in the world around you, including current affairs, economics, technological changes, and social developments. You are not expected to have a detailed understanding of the essay topics which will appear in the exam. What is expected from you, is to create an argument based on explanations, assumptions and analysis that fundamentally form a persuasive and conclusive argument. When choosing which question you are going to answer, it is important that you feel comfortable enough to write approximately words on that topic in a clear, informative and analytical manner.

You will need to keep yourself informed of current affairs and read up on what is going on both internationally and locally, if you wish to score high marks on your LNAT. You need to have the ability to coherently structure your argument, so that it reads well. The sole purpose of the LNAT essay is for you to demonstrate your ability to persuasively conduct an argument and convey your thoughts in the best way possible.

Although your essay does not get marked, and it does not form part of your LNAT score, it will be the only piece of writing that your chosen university will have access to. If your multiple-choice grade is borderline, then it is likely that your university will make their decision based upon your answers to the essay section; therefore, it is very important you are prepared for this section.

The structure of your essay is important. You need to be able to convey each stage of your thought process. You will no doubt have had to write lots of essays prior to taking your LNAT assessment. Thus, you will be no stranger to the basic format of any essay: This is no different in the LNAT.

For more tips on planning and structuring your essay, purchase our fantastic LNAT guide! Should we be patriotic? When answering this question, the first thing you need to be aware of is the definition of patriotism itself.

Patriotism is defined as having an emotional attachment to and pride in a nation, which an individual recognises as their homeland. This question is asking you to analyse two things.

For example, you could look at the positive effects of patriotism; i. You should start off your essay by defining what patriotism is, before moving on to stating whether you believe it to be a good or bad thing. Then, you should state briefly why you believe this. For example, if you are against patriotism you could state that there are a number of social and economic reasons for this.

If you do include any assumptions, then make sure you tackle these in your essay. If you are arguing for patriotism, there are a number of ways in which you can make your argument: Patriotism encourages people to keep to the laws of the country, work for the greater good of the nation and provide support to other citizens within that nation. The more patriotic the citizens of a nation, the more they will work to build a stronger and healthier nation.

This is particularly true for moments of national crisis. The people of the USA banded together to support one another, making the events much easier to cope with from an emotional standpoint. In order to argue against patriotism, there are a number of points which you could make: We are all members of the human race, and are no different to one another.

Countries are just arbitrary borders designed to enforce the idea that English are different from Spanish, Italians from Germans etc. This is not healthy, and often leads to a severe clash of cultures. Primary amongst these is the world wars. In particular, World War 2 was caused by extreme national pride in Germany. Combined with severe social unrest, this led to an uprising which resulted in the deaths of millions of people.

Such events could easily be held without this. This is not healthy. To counter the above, you could argue that there is a difference between patriotism and nationalism. Patriotism means having a healthy respect for your nation, whereas nationalism is the term for taking this to extreme levels.

World wars were caused by nationalism and not patriotism. Patriotic people are not encouraged to hate people of other nations; just to take pride and respect in their own. Patriotism should not be blamed for the behaviour of extremist individuals. You could respond to the above by stating that although there is a difference between patriotism and nationalism, patriotism breeds nationalism.

By enforcing an unnecessary and unhealthy idea that people of one nation are different from those of another, we generate tension between countries, which leads to a sense of hatred from disenchanted individuals. This results in extremist behaviour, and accelerates global conflicts. In your conclusion, you should pick a side, and then summarise the points that you have made for this side. Just as in the essay, it is a good idea to acknowledge the other side of the argument or one particular key facet of this side; before dismissing it with a strong counter argument.

Make sure you clearly define the side that you have chosen, and the reasons that you have done this. Should schools have a uniform? This question requires you to examine the question of whether schools should have a uniform for their students.

In order to answer this question, you should consider the following points. Firstly, you should look at the positive and negative elements that having an established uniform can bring. Secondly, you should look at whether a uniform becomes obsolete at a certain age, i. In your introduction to this essay, you should state where you stand on the issue of schools having a uniform. You can use brief and overarching examples, i. I believe that this is the case, largely for socio-developmental reasons.

You can include assumptions that you expect to make, provided you support them in your essay, and then look at whether you believe there is a particular age at which a uniform loses its value. In order to argue that schools should have a uniform, there are a number of points you could make: Just as you would set rules for children to abide by, in order to encourage order, you would set out a uniform as a code of conduct.

They are at a rebellious age, particularly in their teens, and giving them the choice of what to wear to school could have negative consequences. Schoolkids and teenagers are at a vulnerable age, where they should be focusing on their education. Allowing them to wear their own clothes gives them another thing to think and worry about. Schoolchildren are competitive, and there is a danger that certain individuals will be singled out for their choice of clothing, leading to conflict and distress.

In order to argue against school uniforms, there are a number of points you could make: Their choice of clothing is a fantastic way to do this, and is a key form of expressionism. We are interested in whether you can defend a position — which may or may not be your own personal position. Sometimes you may do better if you attempt to defend a position that you do not agree with personally. This may make your argument tighter.

Follow 5 But whatever position you defend, you are supposed to be defending it as if it were your opinion. So you need to announce your intention to argue for xyz position, and lead to a conclusion in favour of xyz, rather than saying that someone else argues for xyz.

Sharkey97 Follow 0 followers 0 badges Send a private message to Sharkey Follow 6 The title was Does it matter if some species of plants and animals die out. Done in 40 mins. If it did matter, what would this entail? Should we protect each species of flora and fauna, denying any to die out? I believe the correct answer is to be found in the conciliation of the ethical and the sensible.

Yes, the death of species of plants and animals does indeed matter. As an advanced race of beings it is essential that we be in touch and mindful of our environment, and with those that share this environment with us.

However such a position does not invite the scramble to protect each variation of life. We must acknowledge both our own position in the natural order of life, and accept that we are not above this order, but exist within it.

So what then, is the natural order of life on our planet? At its most fundamental level it is that things are born. From that death new things are born. This basic cycle of life, although referencing individual organisms rather than entire species delineates the fact that death plays an integral and unavoidable part of existence. This death does indeed matter, but is beyond our control.

On an inter-species level, Darwinian theory asserts that redundant species shall die out, while superior species more apt to deal with the challenges their environment presents shall survive. Species dying out is no more common than the spinning of the Earth on its axis. Humans must understand why one particular species has died for both pragmatic and philosophical reasons. On a pragmatic level, every happening on the Earth must be viewed as knowledge that can be of use to Humankind.

From the nature of tectonic plate movement to the death of a species of plant, the more we understand about our environment, the better we can progress as a species ourselves, and the better we can care for and protect our environment.

To say that the death of a species does not matter is an almost flippant stance to take which denies humans both the knowledge we may obtain from their dying out and also the relevance that species has had. Although I have previously stated all knowledge can be of use to Man, I do not intend to take the utilitarian approach, merely the pragmatic.

The history of our planet is of the upmost importance independent of Humanity, thus from a more philosophical viewpoint the death of a species matters. It must be recorded and categorised. I have previously stated that it is both foolish and unrealistic to attempt to save each dying species, yet what if the species nears extinction due to adverse human activity?

Since our harmful involvement has caused the species to die out, this is not the natural cycle explained above. We have altered the environment to a harmful degree, thus we must take responsibility for our actions. Saving each species that has become endangered due to the deforestation of the Amazon basin is simply impossible, yet efforts must be made.

The most prudent of these would be preventative measures, rather than reactive ones. Humans must be mindful of their activities and the potential these activities have to destroy not only species but entire eco-systems.

The deaths of these species of course matter. If we have caused them, we must take responsibility for our harm. Ultimately, Humans cannot afford to have the child-like outlook than nothing changes. Our world is in a constant state of growth, decay and renewal.

This state of flux will inevitably lead to the deaths of species. Yet these deaths still matter. If humans were to become extinct, we must believe that our achievements would still hold weight, would still matter beyond our own mortality. We must not seek to protect each species for the sake of doing so, as this would simply be attempting to negate an unavoidable aspect of existence.

Yet we must acknowledge that a species of plant or animal dying out does indeed matter.

Freshers homepage

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

LNAT Essay: Top 6 Tips. Section B of the LNAT is made up of a choice of essay questions inviting you to form and present an argument. You have 40 minutes to complete this and your essay will be sent to each university you apply to which requires the LNAT. LNAT Help; Law News; Diversity in Law; Share this page. Copy. More LNAT Help. LNAT.

Privacy FAQs

Sample essays; Practice tests; Sample essays. Sample essay questions and suggested reading. Here are a few sample essay questions for you to think about. Remember that you get 40 minutes to write a maximum of words Some of them include exercises that can help you develop your LNAT skills.

About Our Ads

Sep 24,  · Hello, I am currently studying for my LNAT test. I would truly appreciate it if you could give me feedback on my LNAT practice test. In advance, I would li. Help state of essay. and the leading lnat practice test and explanations for each question: an effective lnat essay writing guide to help a student’s. Terms of assessment books practice test, concise arguments, especially since it does, chair lnat prep.

Cookie Info

The LNAT is tough. Our unique LNAT Essay Questions guide will help you best prepare, with plenty of sample test questions and a breakdown of answers. A comprehensive overview of what the LNAT essay section entails, and how it is used to assess law candidates. Top tips on how to prepare for the LNAT essay questions. What you have to do in the LNAT essay is Debate by which I mean, write an argument on two sides on the given topic. And the best part is that you can practice for the LNAT essay by reading on absurd issues like, ‘Should prisoners be allowed to vote or not’.